Skip to Content

Stop Oak Flat Land Exchange in Senate

Gaan Canyon Vegetation and WaterGaan Canyon Vegetation and WaterYour action is needed now to stop a compromise on the Oak Flat land exchange bill (S. 409) that is schedule to be marked up in the Senate Energy & Natural Resources Committee on December 16th along with 35 other bills.

This remarkable display of speed was brought about by a deal cut between Senator John McCain of Arizona who has been championing Rio Tinto’s special interest legislation to help him get re-elected to the Senate next year, and Energy & Natural Resources Committee Chairman Jeff Bingaman of New Mexico.

Although Senator Bingaman promised Tribal leaders in a meeting following the Bill’s hearing in June that he would consult with them before any movement of the bill, this deal was struck without input from the Tribes.  In fact, bill language was only shared to a few select groups and then only at the strong insistence to see language and after a promise was extracted not to share the language widely.

What we do know about this deal is troubling.

Please contact members of the Senate Energy & Natural Resources Committee and ask them to oppose any consideration of this amendment.

From what we know, this is what the new version of the bill would do:

  • Immediately allow Rio Tinto to do exploration under the Oak Flat Campground withdrawn area. It would allow directional drill from outside the withdrawn area to anywhere drills could reach. It would allow one drilling pad within the withdrawn area.
    • Oak Flat was withdrawn from mining for a reason – to protect a recreation jewel in the middle of a mining district from further impacts of mining forever. This bill would not only undo those protections, but would set a dangerous precedent making all areas withdrawn from mining nationwide vulnerable to mining.
  • The bill allows the appraisal for the value of the exchange to take place before a mining plan or impact statement is written.
  • The income capitalization approach specified in the bill “can be highly speculative,” according to the Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions, and the 8th Circuit Court found that “many of these factors [needed to make an accurate appraisal] are impossible to predict with reasonable accuracy.”
    • The best an appraiser could do in these circumstances is to make an educated guess. Are we taxpayers willing to risk losing Billions of dollars by asking an appraiser to make a wild guess? This is surely a taxpayer rip-off.
  • The bill allows Rio Tinto to conduct any mining activities except for commercial production of minerals under Apache Leap.
  • While the new language provides some protection for Apache Leap, it ignores the religious significance of Oak Flat Campground, which would become private property and the damage to Gaan Canyon and Queen Creek which would occur if mining begins.
  • The bill removes any deals formerly made with the climbing community from consideration
  • The bill removes the mandate for a replacement campground for Oak Flat.
  • The bill leaves tremendous wiggle room for the appraisal process to cheat the US taxpayer out of full payment for the tremendous natural and mineral resources we would lose.
  • The bill leaves unchanged the provision that allow the Town of Superior the chance to buy (at full market value) land that, without the interference of Rio Tinto, the Town would have received free of charge from the US Forest Service
  • The bill talks about requiring a mining plan of operation and full compliance with NEPA and other environmental laws. It also talks about consultation with Native American Tribes before a decision on the land exchange is made. It seemingly allows the Secretary of Agriculture a chance to turn down the land exchange if it is not in the public interest. All of this is currently the status quo with Administrative land exchanges. However, the fact that the bill strongly directs the Secretary to consider and accept the exchange does not change the basic fact that the Senate wants the predetermined outcome of the bill to benefit a foreign mining company and not their constituents – the US taxpayers who own the land.

Contact info:

Note: Many of the web links only work within the Senators own state

Bill Sponsors:

John McCain
(202) 224-2235
Fax (202)228-2862
http://mccain.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.ContactForm

Jeff Bingaman; New Mexico (Full Committee Chair)
Phone: (202) 224-5521
senator_bingaman@bingaman.senate.gov

Senate Energy & Natural Resource Committee Members

Ron Wyden ; Oregon
(202) 224-5244
http://wyden.senate.gov/contact/

Byron Dorgan, North Dakota
(202) 224-2551
http://dorgan.senate.gov/contact/

Tim Johnson; South Dakota
Tel: (202) 224-5842
http://johnson.senate.gov/contact/

Mary L. Landrieu; Louisiana
Voice: (202)224-5824
Fax:(202) 224-9735
http://landrieu.senate.gov/contact/index.cfm

Maria Cantwell; Washington
202-224-3441
202-228-0514 – FAX
http://cantwell.senate.gov/contact/

Robert Menendez; New Jersey
Phone: (202) 224-4744
Fax: (202) 224-2197
http://menendez.senate.gov/contact/contact.cfm

Blanche Lincoln; Arkansas
Phone: (202) 224-4843
Fax: (202) 228-1371
http://lincoln.senate.gov/webform.html

Evan Bayh; Indiana
(202) 224-5623
http://bayh.senate.gov/contact/

Debbie Stabenow; Michigan
(202) 224-4822
http://stabenow.senate.gov/email.cfm

Mark Udall; Colorado
Phone: (202) 224-5941
Fax: (202) 224-6471
http://markudall.senate.gov/contact/contact.cfm

Jeanne Shaheen; New Hampshire
(202) 224-2841
http://shaheen.senate.gov/contact/

Lisa Murkowski; Alaska
Phone: 202-224-6665
Fax: 202-224-5301
http://murkowski.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactMe.EMailLisa

AttachmentSize
Problems with McCain sustitute.pdf53.67 KB


Dr. Radut | simplenews